Wednesday, February 20, 2019

The Shooting of Michael Brown Essay

Michael cook was an 18 year old barren man who was gun for hire and killed by natural law officeholder Darren Wilson in Ferguson, second 08/9/2014. Michael had intensions to go to college with no previous criminal record. The death of chocolate-brown sparked subsequent events in Ferguson and became a national controversy touching on much larger national issues of race, justice, and police violence. This event grew even more than(prenominal) national wariness when police reacted to protesters, even those acting peacefully, with military-grade equipment such as armored vehicles, tear gas, rubber bullets, and sound cannons. Ties between local residents and their governing body arose again when heard the investigation into the shooting, inherently secretive grand control board proceedings and subsequent reactions which controlled by mostly whit politicians despite Fergusons majority slow population. One of the main reasons this shooting grew national attention was the fear co mmonly held by many p arents is that black lives matter less, oddly in the face of increasingly heavily armed police who select tremendous legal freedom.Allegedly, Wilson claimed that chocolate-brown was charging at him and he fired 6 gunshots at the unarmed man. dark-brown died 150 ft. from the car, despite earlier statements that Brown died just 35 ft. from the vehicle. Two of the six shots were fired at the notch of the unarmed man. Eyewitnesses who went public said Brown and Wilson had a confrontation at the officers SUV. Brown ran and Wilson chased after Brown and shot the teenager to death as he attempted to surrender. Constitutionally, police officers are allowed to shoot to protect their life or the life of another guiltless party, and/or to prevent a suspect from escaping however only if the officer has probable cause to think the suspects committed a serious violent felony. Officers must picture that their actions were objectively reasonable attached the circumsta nces and compared to what other police officers might do (According to David Klinger, University of Missouri-St. Louis Professor).Wilson needed to demonstrate that he feared for his life not just when Brown was by the car, but even after he started shooting, he needed to establish that Brown continued to pose a threat to him until the last fired shot. Browns family urged a Michael Brown law following Grand dialog boxs Decision not to indict Officer Wilson. NAACP, National fulfil Network, and others ware been working with the family to create a law where it requires that every policeofficer in every American city is required to have picture show body cameras that record every move they make.The benefits of officers wearing body-worn video technology include evidence that both officers and civilians acted in a more positive manner when they were aware that a camera was present, new opportunities for in force(p) training of law enforcement officers presented by the use of cameras, and useful evidence of interactions was a good deal captured on video (as reported on the white house petitions gov page). This would be a Consequentialism solution where the consequences of ones conduct are the ultimate basis for any judgment about the rightness or incorrectness of that conduct. Hopefully, this Law will clear up the major hurdles the black community continue to face in the United States 21st Century.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.