he cost associated with running Essay Example for Free

he cost associated with running EssayCandidates should be limited on the amount of cash they can go by during a campaign. The cost associated with running for public office is expensive, especi onlyy in the case of large study scale resources, but also in sm eacher local ones. The money factor discourages regular tenderness class individuals from running for office, often leaving the b completelyot seriously one sided. If spending limits were placed on campaigns, our government could represent the views and issues of the majority of Americans, kind of than only those of the wealthy. Further, if medical prognosiss atomic number 18 given a spending limit, they are less in all likelihood to take money from supporters who will benefit or profit from a exceptional view. Candidates then are to a greater extent(prenominal) likely to make choices based on the good of the community, state, or country, rather than what will bring in the most money. Although mandatory voting cou ld produce both positive and contradict outcomes, voting should be a requirement of all Americans. On one hand, forcing people who do non support any of the candidates on the ballot might lead to careless voting.Those citizens who have no companionship of the people who are running or no interest in voting at all will most likely cast their voter turnouts simply to uphold the law. On the other hand however, if all people are required to vote, and they do so in an educated manner, the government could represent all people of our country, rather than only those who choose to vote. Additionally, if Americans are forced to vote, candidates will spend less money campaigning. The months leading up to election become a time of voicing views rather than persuading people to vote in the first place.The decreased spending will, once again, ease the chances of a candidate taking a particular stance on an issue due to the influence of those who donate to their campaign. Texas should not hol d partisan elections whereby candidates run as a member of a given political party. In these elections, voters are more likely to vote based upon the party that they support in substitution to the views held by the candidate. In a state that is populated by a majority of Republicans such as Texas, a partisan election would limit the amount of Democratic candidates elected to office, resulting in a severely unbalanced government.Suddenly every public office would be held by a Republican. The only real race in a partisan election would be which Republican to vote for. Furthermore, a non partisan election calls attention to the views of the candidate on an individual level, rather than on the views of the political party to which they belong. Those who do not join parties, or who take a stance that is not supported by any party, are more likely to run for office in a non partisan election. These non partisan elections make holding an office more accessible to a wide variety of candidat es, instead of only people who share similar views of Republicans or Democrats.